Interview in regards to "The Winslow Boy"
by CrankyCritic� StarTalks
Academy Award nominee for The Madness of King George, and
star of The Winslow Boy. If you don't know the name Nigel Hawthorne, Cranky urges you
to run down to the local video store and rent a copy of The
Madness of King George to see a performance we think was
superior to Tom Hanks' Oscar winning turn in Forrest Gump. In
New York to promote his latest film, the David Mamet adapted and
directed The Winslow Boy, Hawthorne sat with us to talk about
this film, his Oscar turn, and the brouhaha in the press, after a
small magazine decided to out him and his long time partner.
The true story of the Winslow Boy, of a lad accused of theft and booted from the Royal
Naval Academy without hearing, was as controversial in its day (1910) as anything in
the tabloids today. In a world before radio and television existed, where airplane flight
was a dangerous experiment and movies were a novelty, the papers were full of tales of
The Winslow Boy and his court battle (indeed it was debated on the floor of Parliament)
to "let right be done," and give the boy a fair hearing. Terrence Rattigan's play won
awards on both sides of the Atlantic, and was first made into a movie in the early
1950s starring Robert Donat, Cedric Hardwick and Margaret Leighton. It helps to see
the film (hint, hint) but there's a summary in Cranky's Review
Nigel Hawthorne: The central character of the father is much more austere than the
film and in the stage version. David wanted to show the family side more than the
autocratic father that was viewed by the family. I think that there's much more warmth,
and that you understand more of what drove him to want to see right done. I think it's a
very, very moving story and will always be moving because it's about those values that
we hold dear to us and that we often see squandered.
CrankyCritic: There's a moment early in the movie where the father seems surprised
that the son is afraid of him.
Nigel Hawthorne: Yes. But you can play quite differently. You can play that the whole
family knew, of course, that the boy had returned and had been standing in the rain and
were afraid to tell the father because of the repercussions. He then says "or you afraid
of me" to the boy. So you could play it that he's the sort of man that a child would fear
and maybe he does fear him. Would you fear a father that was a lot older thing you?
He must have had him very late in life. Because, I'm 70 now, so I would have had to
have had the boy in minded '50s. My own father didn't marry until he was over 40.
Maybe that's the sort of thing that has carried over. I mean it's perfectly plausible.
CrankyCritic: How is David Mamet regarded by the English theater scene? Was there
any trepidation about taking on this archetypical English story?
Nigel Hawthorne: I don't really think that they know too much about it yet. We haven't
done a publicity campaign over there. David is very highly regarded. Oleanna and the
things that he's done at the National Theater have been very well received. He has a
very good reputation, but only in the theater. I don't think we've seen The Spanish
Prisoner there yet. So his film reputation is not on the same level as his theater
reputation. I went to a showing of this in London and I didn't know what he had done
with it. It could have been disastrous but the reception at the end, the respect that he
garnered during the showing of the picture was enormous. Already the London critics
have spied it out over here and have reported very favorably.
CrankyCritic: Is there a sense that because he is American he's bringing a different
kind of eye. . .
Nigel Hawthorne: Yes. I think that's why I did it, you know. Why do The Winslow
Boy, which is a very good story but its been done. If you need a new eye on it, then
David's eye is certainly an original one
CrankyCritic: Many many years ago, you had auditioned for the RSC...
Nigel Hawthorne: A lot
CrankyCritic: And every year and they said "no". Nowadays a lot of people consider
you one of the great classical actors...
Nigel Hawthorne: Thank you.
CrankyCritic: Given that experience, how does that make you feel about the iffy-ness
and the chance of succeeding as an actor?
Nigel Hawthorne: I of course enough alone. There are so many of us and some are
somewhat lucky enough to get a break. And if they do get a break, some are not clever
enough to take advantage of it. I certainly tried for many years to join the RSC,
because I really believe that to want to become a classical actor in the right way. The
right way was to go to Stratford and start at the bottom and work your way up. That
wasn't allowed, and when the National Theater with Laurence Olivier called, I auditioned
for that and never got into that. So that was very disappointing because I could see
these great companies, and even the repertory companies -- the big ones -- I never,
ever had a chance of working with them. So I didn't have that sort of classical trained
background which I yearned for. It never came my way. Then I did a modern play with
Royal Shakespeare Company in 1978 and on the opening night Trevor Nunn, who ran
the Company, came into my room. He was wearing an enormous, white fur coat and
threw his arms around me (it was in the '70s) and said "Please, please promise me
you'll come to Stratford". When he's gone out of the room, the people in the room said
"Oh! He's invited you to Stratford" I said "I've been trying to get to fucking Stratford ever
since I began" in 1951!
CrankyCritic: That couldn't have been fun.
Nigel Hawthorne: Well, I suppose at the time I was a bit angry. But you get to know
there's no point in being angry. That's part of the job you've chosen. Now, I'm going to
play King Lear at Stratford in August. It's a huge honor to play Shakespeare's greatest
play over the millennium at Stratford, his birthplace and where he died. But also
Shakespeare was very much a man of the millennium in Britain but it's my first time
that I've ever played at Stratford.
CrankyCritic: You've been doing a lot of movies lately, there's a lot going on
Nigel Hawthorne: Yes, the problem is that I'm 70 and you think that there's so little
time left. I've wished that I've had at the beginning the opportunities that I have now.
They've all the left to the end.
CrankyCritic: Tell us about the film which opened Americans eyes, The Madness of
King George.
Nigel Hawthorne: Well, it started here. I did a play called Shadowlands with Jane
Alexander and Nick Hytner, who was putting on Miss Saigon on the road came to a
performance at the end of the run, with Jonathan Pryce who was in Miss Saigon.
They're both quite difficult people socially and we went and had a meal afterwards. It
was quite difficult meal because I was doing all the talking. They were just sitting there
and saying that they did enjoy it. I was thinking "they're lying" [laughs] and then, a few
weeks after that play folded, I went back to England and within a few days I got an offer
to do The Madness of King George, or George the Third as it was then called, which
he was directing. So, obviously, he had quite liked Shadowlands. But Anthony Hopkins
did the movie of that, you know, which I understood.
CrankyCritic: The story has gone around that Alan Bennett had written the play with
you in mind.
Nigel Hawthorne: No. No. The fact Alan Bennett had written what he thought, I think,
was a satire about the difference between the attitudes of the politicians of the day and
the medical profession of the day and through the center of it all was an ailing King. It
wasn't until we did the reading for the first time that Alan realized, for the first time, that
it was the story of the King that held the thing together. The satirical thing wasn't the
satirical thing. It was much more the emotional core of this wronged man.
CrankyCritic: Without sounding rude, because I do that think that you should have
received an Academy Award for that role, is there a reticence among English actors to
do the campaigning necessary to win an Oscar ?
Nigel Hawthorne: It's very alien to us, you know. It's something that we're not used
to. We're used to just getting up and doing the job. If somebody pats you on the back,
that's fine. That's extra. As for the campaign, the one that you're talking about, we
made the initial mistake of opening the movie here to late. In fact it was so late it didn't
qualify for the Golden Globes. It also coincided with the breakup of the Goldwyn Empire
and he was having big financial problems. I was brought over to New York for a flurry of
interviews. I know that Forrest Gump, which won, sent Tom Hanks on a nationwide
campaign and that the publicity cost in this country alone was eight times our entire
budget. So you realize what you're against. I knew when I got off the plane in Los
Angeles for the Academy Awards that Hanks had won, or that if I had a hope it would
have been the very outside chance of winning because it was essentially an American
celebration. Okay, I had been patted on the back to what I've done. They said okay
you've got the nomination but you're not going any further. And I sort of knew that.
CrankyCritic: Did you enjoy the ceremony?
Nigel Hawthorne: No, it was very uncomfortable.
CrankyCritic: Because you were "outed" just prior to the ceremony?
Nigel Hawthorne: It was kind of difficult because I was taking Loretta Swit, who is a
friend, and my partner. We were given three seats and I was told that there would be
two seats together and the third at the back. So I had to make a choice. I wrote to
Loretta and said 'Look you must understand that we've lived together for 20 years and I
cannot not be sitting next to [him]. Would you mind sitting at the back?' And straight
away she said "I totally understand. You must do it." But then they changed and they
gave us three seats together.
It was a very difficult situation because I was outed by this magazine called The
Advocate. I didn't know the magazine. I don't mix in those circles. We lead a very quiet
life. The Goldwyn office asked if I would do an interview with The Advocate and I said I
don't know what is. They said it's a gay magazine and it has a small circulation. You
have a lot of interviews. You don't have to if you don't want to. I said well let's leave it. I
was doing theater in the West End and they approached my producer who told them
that I had done 70 interviews and that I was all interviewed out. They said "Well, if he
doesn't give us the interview we'll write the story anyway".
So I called this girl up and said ...
"I understand you wish to write a story about me".
"Yes."
"May I ask you a few questions, first? Have you got a lover yourself?"
"Yes," she had.
"Are you happy?" This she was.
"And how long have you been together?"
"Six years."
"Is it a man or woman?"
"It's a woman."
"Well, now you understand my situation. So please respect it."
We did the interview and, apparently, I never saw it. It was never sent to me but it was
apparently sympathetic. But of course the world press got hold of it and it was
splashed all over the papers and really horrific. It was terrible. We had to hire four
security guards to keep them away from the house. When I came to the Academy
Awards, I had to be smuggled to the airport and we were actually checked in in the car
park. It was ludicrous because I was then mid-'60s and we'd lived together 20 years. I
was doing then what I'm doing now, advertising a movie, and every question was about
my personal life. So it was very difficult. Now that that's happened, it's done. So it's
fine.
Interview � 1999 CrankyCritic. All Rights Reserved.
|