|
|
THEATRE: King Lear on a grand scale
By Alastair Macaulay, Financial Times, November 1st 1999
King Lear at the Barbican Theatre, London EC2
It is strange and satisfying to find that what appeals most in the
Japanese director Yukio Ninagawa's new production of King
Lear is its sense of tradition. Of two traditions, in fact: those of
Japanese and British theatre - this is a co-production with the
Royal Shakespeare Company. The characters are dressed by
Lily Komine in flowing Japanese cloaks and gowns, the sets are
picked out by Yukio Horio with Japanese motifs, and the scenes
are linked by the utterly Japanese soundworld of Ryudo Uzak's
music.
Amid this exotic surround, the actors - all (save one) British -
deliver an absolutely solid old-style account of Shakespeare's
tragedy, with no obviously modern emphasis or reinterpretation.
The sheer simplicity with which they often remain motionless while
they cast their words on to the air speaks of the noblest kind of
theatre tradition, and every gesture, every change of physical
focus, makes its sure impact throughout the depth and breadth
and height of the Barbican Theatre. The story becomes absolutely
clear, and its sheer theatricality becomes here a constant
pleasure.
At the centre of it all, Nigel Hawthorne gives an impressive,
hot-blooded, changeable, touching, account of the title role. He is
not one of your roaring, leonine Lears. But he never feels like a
comedian spluttering out of his depth; and he never forces any
artificial kind of power. Hawthorne's Lear has natural authority,
within which he shows us the heart that suffers, the spirit that
smiles, the mind that learns.
Nonetheless, in Ninagawa's hands, the play feels less like a
colossal tragedy than a rip-roaring historical melodrama. Too
many of the supporting actors indulge in an actorly relish for
theatrical effects. Fruity vocal tone; flashing eyes; swirling cloaks;
imperious turns of head. In the case of Anna Chancellor's Regan,
this was to be expected; she is an invariably camp, unsubtle
performer. But I am sorry to see Michael Maloney, a gifted actor,
continue his decline into over-burnished delivery; from his
opening words on, you know that This Is An Ack-Tor. And I am yet
more sorry to see Si�n Thomas, an actress of really rare
complexity and wit, continue her decline into cheap Wicked Witch
of the West exaggeration. Hiroyuki Sanada - who worked so well
(in Japanese) as Ninagawa's Hamlet a year ago - joins the long
list of actors who cannot bring off the role of the Fool; in diction
and body language he is wholly contrived and, in a bad sense,
fey. John Carlisle, however, is an excellent Gloucester. Even
though this is one of Shakespeare's most actor-friendly roles, the
poignancy he finds in the simple words "I have no way" has a rare
impact. Christopher Benjamin is a stalwart Kent, and William
Armstrong an incisive Edmund.
Ninagawa makes something unusual of the storm: heavy lumps of
metal keep dropping, separately and unpredictably, from above
(this device is thrilling until it is overdone) and (better) the lightning
flashes come like long warm waves of strange sunlight. The
lighting is by Tamotsu Harada, and I love the Liebestod glow with
which he suddenly suffuses the stage as Lear dies. This is King
Lear on a grand scale. The production seldom takes you into the
churning core of Shakespeare's drama, but at all points it
demonstrates its theatrical amplitude.
Review � 1999 The Financial Times. All Rights Reserved.
|